Assessment and comparison of the morphology and function of the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus in type-1 diabetes mellitus patients and in healthy subjects
Full text

Supplementary Files

Figure 1A
Figure 1B
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

How to Cite

Derkac I, Januleviciene I, Asselineau K, Velickiene D. Assessment and comparison of the morphology and function of the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus in type-1 diabetes mellitus patients and in healthy subjects. MAIO [Internet]. 2016 Feb. 24 [cited 2023 Mar. 24];1(1):51-63. Available from:

Copyright notice

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work twelve (12) months after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.

  2. After 12 months from the date of publication, authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.


contact corneal esthesiometry; corneal confocal microscopy; corneal sensitivity; diabetes mellitus; diabetic neuropathy.


Aim/purpose: It is believed that small nerve bundles are damaged in the earliest stages of neuropathy caused by diabetes mellitus (DM). Our goal was to evaluate and compare anatomical characteristics of corneal nerve fibers and corneal sensitivity in type-1 DM patients and in healthy control subjects.

Design: A prospective, masked, controlled cross-sectional clinical study.

Method: Thirty patients with type-1 DM and ten non-diabetic healthy subjects underwent a corneal confocal microscopy to evaluate the corneal sub-basal nerve fibers (density, number of nerves and branches, total nerve length) and contact corneal esthesiometry.

Results: Diabetic patients had significantly lower corneal nerve fiber density density (14.32 ± 5.87 vs. 19.71 ± 5.59 mm/mm2; p = 0.023 ) nerve branches number (4.57 ± 3,91 vs. 9.90 ± 5.8 n°/image; p = 0.006) , nerve fiber length (2.28 ± 0.94 vs. 3.13 ± 0.89 mm; p = 0.032) and corneal sensitivity (1.13 ± 0.29 vs. 0.98 ± 0.058 gr/mm2 p = 0.02), as compared with controls. A negative correlation was found between corneal nerve fiber length, corneal nerve number, corneal nerve fiber density and disease duration (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Corneal confocal microscopy and corneal sensitivity evaluation are noninvasive techniques helping to detect early changes in the sub-basal nerve plexus characteristic for diabetic neuropathy (DN) in patients with type-1 DM. Further studies are required to investigate the role of corneal neuropathy assessment using these novel techniques as a toll to detect early DN.
Full text


Pritchard N, Edwards K, Vagenas D, Shahidi AM, Sampson GP, Russell AW, Malik RA, Efron N. Corneal sensitivity as an ophthalmic marker of diabetic neuropathy. Optom Vis Sci. 2010 Dec;87(12):1003-8. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181fd6188. PubMed PMID: 21037498.

Pirart J. Diabetes mellitus and its degenerative complications: a prospective study of 4,400 patients observed between 1947 and 1973 (author's transl). Diabete Metab. 1977 Dec;3(4):245-56. French. PubMed PMID: 598565.

Tesfaye S, Chaturvedi N, Eaton SE, Ward JD, Manes C, Ionescu-Tirgoviste C, Witte DR, Fuller JH, EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study Group. Vascular risk factors and diabetic neuropathy. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 27;352(4):341-50. PubMed PMID: 15673800.

The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med.1993;329:977–86.

Dyck PJ, Overland CJ, Low PA, Litchy WJ, Davies JL, Dyck PJ, O'Brien PC; Cl vs. NPhys Trial Investigators, Albers JW, Andersen H, Bolton CF, England JD, Klein CJ, Llewelyn JG, Mauermann ML, Russell JW, Singer W, Smith AG, Tesfaye S, Vella A. Signs and symptoms versus nerve conduction studies to diagnose diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy: Cl vs. NPhys trial. Muscle Nerve. 2010 Aug;42(2):157-64. doi: 10.1002/mus.21661. PubMed PMID: 20658599; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2956592.

Smith AG, Russell J, Feldman EL, Goldstein J, Peltier A, Smith S, Hamwi J, Pollari D, Bixby B, Howard J, Singleton JR. Lifestyle intervention for pre-diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2006 Jun;29(6):1294-9. PubMed PMID: 16732011.

Tavakoli M, Mitu-Pretorian M, Petropoulos IN, Fadavi H, Asghar O, Alam U, Ponirakis G, Jeziorska M, Marshall A, Efron N, Boulton AJ, Augustine T, Malik RA. Corneal confocal microscopy detects early nerve regeneration in diabetic neuropathy after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. Diabetes. 2013 Jan;62(1):254-60. doi: 10.2337/db12-0574. Epub 2012 Sep 21. PubMed PMID: 23002037; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3526062.

England JD, Gronseth GS, Franklin G, Carter GT, Kinsella LJ, Cohen JA, Asbury AK, Szigeti K, Lupski JR, Latov N, Lewis RA, Low PA, Fisher MA, Herrmann DN, Howard JF Jr, Lauria G, Miller RG, Polydefkis M, Sumner AJ; American Academy of Neurology. Practice Parameter: evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy (an evidence-based review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology. 2009 Jan 13;72(2):177-84. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000336345.70511.0f. Epub 2008 Dec 3. Review. PubMed PMID: 19056667.

Rosenberg ME, Tervo TM, Immonen IJ, Müller LJ, Grönhagen-Riska C, Vesaluoma MH. Corneal structure and sensitivity in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Sep;41(10):2915-21. PubMed PMID: 10967045.

Tavakoli M, Quattrini C, Abbott C, Kallinikos P, Marshall A, Finnigan J, Morgan P, Efron N, Boulton AJ, Malik RA. Corneal confocal microscopy: a novel noninvasive test to diagnose and stratify the severity of human diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2010 Aug;33(8):1792-7. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0253. Epub 2010 Apr 30. PubMed PMID: 20435796; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2909064.

Ahmed A, Bril V, Orszag A, Paulson J, Yeung E, Ngo M, Orlov S, Perkins BA. Detection of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy by corneal confocal microscopy in type 1 diabetes: a concurrent validity study. Diabetes Care. 2012 Apr;35(4):821-8. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1396. Epub 2012 Feb 8. PubMed PMID: 22323412; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3308301.

Patel DV, McGhee CNJ. Mapping the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus in keratoconus by in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy.. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47(4):1348-1351.

Tuominen ISJ, Konttinen YT, Vesaluoma MH, Moilanen JAO, Helinto¨ M, Tervo TMT. Corneal Innervation and Morphology in Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci 2003 Jun;44(6):2545-2549.

Jm, d.C. (Benitez), , Wasfy MA, Fernandez C, Garcia-Sanchez J. An in vivo confocal masked study on corneal epithelium and subbasal nerves in patients with dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004 2004;45:3030-3035.

Niederer RL, Perumal D, Sherwin T, McGhee CN. Corneal innervation and cellular changes after corneal transplantation: an in vivo confocal microscopy study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007 2007;48:621-626.

Erie JC, McLarenJW, Hodge DO , et al. Recovery of corneal subbasal nerve density after PRK and LASIK. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140(6):1059-1064.

Caselli 1A, Spallone V, Marfia GA, Battista C, Pachatz C, Veves A, et al. Validation of the nerve axon reflex for the assessment of small nerve fibre dysfunction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77(8):927-932.

Parissi M, Karanis G, Randjelovic S, Germundsson J, Poletti E, Ruggeri A, et al. Standardized baseline human corneal subbasal nerve density for clinical investigations with laser-scanning in vivo confocal microscopy.. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013 Oct;54(10):7091-7102.

Martin XY, Safran AB. Corneal hypoesthesia. Surv Ophthalmol 1988;33(1):28-40. Available from: PubMed PMID: 3051467. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(88)90070-7.

Malik RA, Kallinikos P, Abbott CA, van Schie CHM, Morgan P, Efron N, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy: a non-invasive surrogate of nerve fibre damage and repair in diabetic patients.. Diabetologia 2003 May;46(5):683-688.

Quattrini C, Tavakoli M, Jeziorska M, Kallinikos P, Tesfaye S, Finnigan J, et al. Surrogate markers of small fiber damage in human diabetic neuropathy.. Diabetes 2007 May;56(8):2148-2154.

Ishibashi F, , Okino M, Ishibashi M, Kawasaki A, Endo N, Kosaka A, et al. Corneal nerve fiber pathology in Japanese type 1 diabetic patients and its correlation with antecedent glycemic control and blood pressure. J Diabetes Investig 2012 Mar;3(2):191-198.

Pritchard N, Edwards K, Vagenas D, Russell AW, Malik RA, Efron N. Corneal sensitivity is related to established measures of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Clin Exp Optom 2012 Apr;95(3):355-361.

Tavakoli M, Kallinikos P, Iqbal A, Herbert A, Fadavi H, Efron N, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy detects improvement in corneal nerve morphology with an improvement in risk factors for diabetic neuropathy. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03372.x Diabetic Medicine Volume 28, Issue 2011;28(10):1261-1267.

Tavakoli M, Petropoulos IN, Malik RA. Assessing corneal nerve structure and function in diabetic neuropathy. Clin Exp Optom 2012;95(3):338-347.

Dabbah MA, Graham J, Petropoulos I, Tavakoli M, Malik RA. Dual-model automatic detection of nerve-fibres in corneal confocal microscopy images.. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2010;13(Pt 1):300-307.

Dabbah MA, Graham J, Petropoulos IN, Tavakoli M, Malik RA. Automatic analysis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy using multi-scale quantitative morphology of nerve fibres in corneal confocal microscopy imaging. Med Image Anal 2011;15(5):738-747.

Shtein RM, Callaghan BC. Corneal confocal microscopy as a measure of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes 2013;62(1):25-26.

Full text